More on 12/29/2014 Fluent efficiency licensing is also the advantage of the environment

What do we do? Household Labour Wages Business Legislation Entrepreneurship Innovation and expertise in trade policy Energy, transport and environment for EU Affairs EK and member associations Affiliates organization and institutions EK Brussels EK's companies Newsroom News Events Blog EK's webcam members Courses Verkkomilo efficiency Publications efficiency Legal Polls companies Materials Information Graphics Publications and reports Contracts for the media Contact
For business it is one of the main objectives of this government-season take the Environmental Protection Act, the overall reform of the environmental authorization process streamlining and accelerating. efficiency
Parliament, the present government proposal contains specific proposals aimed at streamlining, but for the majority of activities have been ongoing EPA phase II. EK stresses that the reform of the stage II have to be prepared as well as legal regulation that the level of changes in so far as the effectiveness of the creative environment for streamlining the authorization procedure requires it.
New legislation may require mm. the different powers of the authorities border (advance) conference effective and consistent implementation and application, permits the review and operation of non-essential efficiency changes in the treatment of authorizing a reasonable time to secure an obligation and a statement of practice. In addition, the law may require to support reforms to the different stages of the licensing process consistency and example. Specification of essentials could reduce Permitting problem areas (such as uniform parameters / frame creation selvitysvelvoitteille, lupamääräyksille, the authorization decision, efficiency the monitoring program, etc.), section by section comments
The draft 22 proposes that the processing time, which would direktiviilaitoksen review of the permit of the new BAT conclusions have been completed. This should be resolved as soon as possible and no later than 10 months after the initiation of proceedings. EK in favor of the Regulation lays down the processing time. Instead, the solution in which the Industrial Emissions Directive 4-year period would provide the so-called. the final authorization during efficiency the treatment period, does not appear to be successful. This permit a long processing time can not in any circumstances be regarded as reasonable efficiency and not a legislative solution efficiency also did not give a credible picture speed-up and sujuvoittamispyrkimyksestä.
EK proposes that the regulation be added to 22 of extract The provision of all licensing issues regarding. Things to current performance management method divides the processing of new permits and permit reviews. Time limits should be applied to online services, where the total processing time should still A weighting the various stages of the licensing process. For the time-limits (such as the current profit periods) could be in AVI to follow, efficiency must necessarily make the same changes as well as permission to tarkistamiskäytäntöihin efficiency that lupavelvollisten amount.
The current environmental regulation 17 provides efficiency that the application shall be processed promptly and the licensing authority is processing the application, ensure the necessary liaison with the authorities at the same time dealing with the operation of other licensing issues and plans. The provision does not overlap with the corresponding provisions of the Administrative, but they are the environmental issues complementary. A similar provision is included in the draft. Provision should be stored in the processing time and the reasonableness of the prior consultation safeguards for and at the same time to prepare for the development of the Phase II progresses.
The current Environmental Protection Act 55: According to the environmental review of the treated exactly the same as the application for authorization. Provision and guidance in spite review the permits in principle not lighter than the new permit processing. For this reason, it seems clear that the authorization procedure for the revision of the key factors must be adjusted more precisely. Similarly, a non-substantial change in the treatment should be clear provisions (influenced, for example. Articles 8 and 9 of).
As some of the business sector unions, efficiency EK is not in favor of the draft 14 of the new Article 8 paragraph 1, in accordance with the operation of the maximum provision. Permits must be proportionate to the environmental load and impact, and they are not in direct efficiency relation to the capacity / volume of production. The practice efficiency of capacity is only a decision as background information, has been working well. Section should be removed from the regulation.
More on 12/29/2014 Fluent efficiency licensing is also the advantage of the environment
Topical Archives March 2015 February 2015 january 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February efficiency 2014 january 2014 December 2013 November efficiency 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March january 2013 February 2013 December 2013 2012 November 2012 OCTOBER 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June