The Nobel Peace Prize to the OPCW, to be sure not to mistake | Slate
The Nobel Peace Prize to the OPCW, to be sure not to mistake Once again, bean bags the Norwegian committee recognizes an international organization. This has an advantage with the institutions, the risks are less controversial ones.
F or the second consecutive year, the Committee of the Norwegian Parliament, which awards the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded an international organization. Last year, it was the European Union, this year is the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons bean bags (OPCW). The Committee is quite customary bean bags due.
Before World War II, he had already crowned some institutions, such as the Red Cross, and not just people who had worked well for peace in the world. But this trend seems to be confirmed. Since 1994 the prize to Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin for their efforts in favor of peace in the Middle East, the distinction went eight times to organizations [1].
Is this a sign of some embarrassment? Maybe. Because people do not always show crowned themselves worthy of their high historical facts or expectations placed in them. Some winners were disappointed, either because their action has not resulted in the desired appeasement or because it was discovered subsequently that their love of peace had been unsatisfactory.
With institutions, the risks are less controversial ones. 189 states have signed and ratified the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, adopted in 1993, who gave birth in 1997 to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. All can feel honored by the decision of the Norwegian parliament. Only four states that have not signed the Convention (North Korea, Egypt, Angola, South Sudan) and those that have signed but not ratified as Israel and Burma, may feel left out. Won a prize, but few bold
This does not hold true when the Nobel prize recognizes a defender of human rights in an authoritarian country, even dictatorial. That State considered the Nobel Prize not as a contribution to peace, but as a threat to the proper functioning of international relations. China continues to pay the price in Norway in 2010 attributed to dissident Liu Xiaobo.
Distinguishing the OPCW, the Nobel Committee has not shown great courage. This does not mean that the price is undeserved. On the contrary. Since its inception, the organization has done a lot of work to implement the 1993 Convention. An agreement bean bags that, at the time, owes much to the efforts of French diplomacy.
The Convention is an extension of the protocol signed in 1925 a few years after the end of World War I during which the mustard bean bags was sadly experienced. It prohibits the research, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and prohibits signatory countries to help others to get them. 57,000 bean bags tons of chemical weapons bean bags were destroyed and the largest holders, including the United States and Russia continue to destroy it, even if it is at a pace that would OPCW faster.
The Nobel Committee has highlighted the substantive work that should not be overshadowed by the news. The Syrian conflict has undoubtedly weighed in the decision of the Norwegians. But in principle the list of candidates for the Nobel Prize for Peace was arrested in February, before the first information on the use of sarin gas in Syria have been published.
If the massacre of August 21 near Damascus has drawn attention to the danger of non-conventional weapons, the Chairman of the Nobel Committee Thorbjoern Jagland was right to emphasize "the important work of the OPCW to eliminate weapons chemical "worldwide. Unfinished.
[1] 1995: Joseph Rotblat and the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, 1997: International Campaign to Ban Landmines and Jody Williams, 1999: Doctors Without Borders, 2001: The United Nations and its Secretary-General Kofi Annan, 2005: International Atomic Energy Agency and its director Mohamed ElBaradei, 2006: Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank, 2007: Al Gore and IPCC chaired by Indian Rajendra bean bags Kumar Pachauri, 2012: European Union. Back to Article
Daniel Daniel Vernet Vernet, journalist and former editorial director of the World and a specialist in international relations. He wrote many books including most recently "China against America, bean bags the duel of the century", bean bags Grasset, with Alain Frachon. Articles
Title of the message:
Is Sarkozy coming back?
Behind the scenes bean bags of the award of the Nobel Prize in comics
October 16, 2013 - Ursula Michel "I want
The Nobel Peace Prize to the OPCW, to be sure not to mistake Once again, bean bags the Norwegian committee recognizes an international organization. This has an advantage with the institutions, the risks are less controversial ones.
F or the second consecutive year, the Committee of the Norwegian Parliament, which awards the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded an international organization. Last year, it was the European Union, this year is the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons bean bags (OPCW). The Committee is quite customary bean bags due.
Before World War II, he had already crowned some institutions, such as the Red Cross, and not just people who had worked well for peace in the world. But this trend seems to be confirmed. Since 1994 the prize to Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin for their efforts in favor of peace in the Middle East, the distinction went eight times to organizations [1].
Is this a sign of some embarrassment? Maybe. Because people do not always show crowned themselves worthy of their high historical facts or expectations placed in them. Some winners were disappointed, either because their action has not resulted in the desired appeasement or because it was discovered subsequently that their love of peace had been unsatisfactory.
With institutions, the risks are less controversial ones. 189 states have signed and ratified the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, adopted in 1993, who gave birth in 1997 to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. All can feel honored by the decision of the Norwegian parliament. Only four states that have not signed the Convention (North Korea, Egypt, Angola, South Sudan) and those that have signed but not ratified as Israel and Burma, may feel left out. Won a prize, but few bold
This does not hold true when the Nobel prize recognizes a defender of human rights in an authoritarian country, even dictatorial. That State considered the Nobel Prize not as a contribution to peace, but as a threat to the proper functioning of international relations. China continues to pay the price in Norway in 2010 attributed to dissident Liu Xiaobo.
Distinguishing the OPCW, the Nobel Committee has not shown great courage. This does not mean that the price is undeserved. On the contrary. Since its inception, the organization has done a lot of work to implement the 1993 Convention. An agreement bean bags that, at the time, owes much to the efforts of French diplomacy.
The Convention is an extension of the protocol signed in 1925 a few years after the end of World War I during which the mustard bean bags was sadly experienced. It prohibits the research, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and prohibits signatory countries to help others to get them. 57,000 bean bags tons of chemical weapons bean bags were destroyed and the largest holders, including the United States and Russia continue to destroy it, even if it is at a pace that would OPCW faster.
The Nobel Committee has highlighted the substantive work that should not be overshadowed by the news. The Syrian conflict has undoubtedly weighed in the decision of the Norwegians. But in principle the list of candidates for the Nobel Prize for Peace was arrested in February, before the first information on the use of sarin gas in Syria have been published.
If the massacre of August 21 near Damascus has drawn attention to the danger of non-conventional weapons, the Chairman of the Nobel Committee Thorbjoern Jagland was right to emphasize "the important work of the OPCW to eliminate weapons chemical "worldwide. Unfinished.
[1] 1995: Joseph Rotblat and the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, 1997: International Campaign to Ban Landmines and Jody Williams, 1999: Doctors Without Borders, 2001: The United Nations and its Secretary-General Kofi Annan, 2005: International Atomic Energy Agency and its director Mohamed ElBaradei, 2006: Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank, 2007: Al Gore and IPCC chaired by Indian Rajendra bean bags Kumar Pachauri, 2012: European Union. Back to Article
Daniel Daniel Vernet Vernet, journalist and former editorial director of the World and a specialist in international relations. He wrote many books including most recently "China against America, bean bags the duel of the century", bean bags Grasset, with Alain Frachon. Articles
Title of the message:
Is Sarkozy coming back?
Behind the scenes bean bags of the award of the Nobel Prize in comics
October 16, 2013 - Ursula Michel "I want
No comments:
Post a Comment