The EU will study the environmental tax reform. Here are the benefits of shift taxation from labor to pollution | Greenews.info
International Politics, National Projects Products Services Public Sector Enterprises Practices Non-Profit Ideas Events Reviews Cinemambiente Tested for you Normative Normative Funding Categories Bulletin Europe Champions of Italy Impressions Travel Off the Green Project Guarene Tales of Environment Top Contributors Very Important Planet Smart City Login Mediakit Live Blog Info
It is the effect it would have a environmental tax reform in the European Union. smoky mountains The possible benefits, in economic terms, produced by "eco-taxes" for example, air and water pollution and the lightening, in parallel, taxes on labor. For example, a reduction in the tax burden on labor income by 4% (about 1,000 euros for a gross annual income of 25,000) by a corresponding increase in energy taxation, charging and transport fuels in proportion to emissions, according to the principle: "pollute more, pay more." All this, it should be noted, without increasing the overall tax burden!
"Greening the fiscal system." So you can summarize the content of the first document, which highlights the benefits of "green taxes" and is based on data from 12 States. It is, in essence, the mechanism smoky mountains of the "double dividend" that underlie much of the environmental tax reforms. Green fees have, in fact, usually a double result: benefiting the environment (first dividend) and give the opportunity to reduce distortionary taxes, such as those at work (second dividend).
Astonishing figures that would be even higher if in addition to shifting the tax burden from labor to pollution, it would provide for measures to abolish smoky mountains subsidies harmful to the environment. In the case of Italy, eliminate harmful subsidies, such as fossil fuels, according to EU estimates would result in a potential revenue of 6 billion a year by 2015. Said in other words, it is the incorporation of the cost of damage environmental, and their repair, directly in the price of goods, services or activities smoky mountains that are causing it. Environmental taxes allow, in this way, to control the negative effects of the action of an economic entity, the cost of which, in the absence of compensation, would fall on the entire community.
Decline in the cost of labor, more resources, welfare and incentives for ecological behavior: a win-win approach that truly represents a viable macroeconomic policy. The eco-tax smoky mountains is certainly best known, today, the carbon tax, which relates to fossil smoky mountains fuels based on their carbon content. However, we can distinguish three types of environmental taxation: to cover costs of environmental services and pollution reduction measures; to change the behavior of consumers and producers; Finally, environmental levies taxes, which are intended, first, to increase revenue to the exchequer.
To be fair, at European smoky mountains level, little has been done so far to create a real "Green New Deal". The rock is always the same: the unfinished political smoky mountains union of the EU. What tax, how and to what extent - beyond the great instructions issued by the European Union already contained in the original Treaties - it's all national matters, and the United States are still reluctant to give up parts of their sovereignty in this area.
The second study provides further evidence of the overall macroeconomic benefits smoky mountains resulting from early investment in flood defense measures. "Investing in flood protection can bring overall benefits to the economy, especially if you prefer solutions based on nature, smoky mountains very effective in terms of cost," said Environment Commissioner smoky mountains Janez Potočnik. Focusing on measures smoky mountains to reduce flooding, in fact, a cost from 6 to 8 times lower than that to repair the damage caused by floods. A substantial savings if you only think that spending related to the total damage caused by the floods in the EU in the period 2002-2013, it was at least 150 billion Euros. Moreover, the benefits derived from investments in green infrastructure, such as the restoration of natural elements to manage and store water during floods, include increasing the biodiversity and the reduction of costs related to construction. For these reasons it is necessary to support SMEs to use resources efficiently.
The challenge is therefore smoky mountains to reflect on the relationship
International Politics, National Projects Products Services Public Sector Enterprises Practices Non-Profit Ideas Events Reviews Cinemambiente Tested for you Normative Normative Funding Categories Bulletin Europe Champions of Italy Impressions Travel Off the Green Project Guarene Tales of Environment Top Contributors Very Important Planet Smart City Login Mediakit Live Blog Info
It is the effect it would have a environmental tax reform in the European Union. smoky mountains The possible benefits, in economic terms, produced by "eco-taxes" for example, air and water pollution and the lightening, in parallel, taxes on labor. For example, a reduction in the tax burden on labor income by 4% (about 1,000 euros for a gross annual income of 25,000) by a corresponding increase in energy taxation, charging and transport fuels in proportion to emissions, according to the principle: "pollute more, pay more." All this, it should be noted, without increasing the overall tax burden!
"Greening the fiscal system." So you can summarize the content of the first document, which highlights the benefits of "green taxes" and is based on data from 12 States. It is, in essence, the mechanism smoky mountains of the "double dividend" that underlie much of the environmental tax reforms. Green fees have, in fact, usually a double result: benefiting the environment (first dividend) and give the opportunity to reduce distortionary taxes, such as those at work (second dividend).
Astonishing figures that would be even higher if in addition to shifting the tax burden from labor to pollution, it would provide for measures to abolish smoky mountains subsidies harmful to the environment. In the case of Italy, eliminate harmful subsidies, such as fossil fuels, according to EU estimates would result in a potential revenue of 6 billion a year by 2015. Said in other words, it is the incorporation of the cost of damage environmental, and their repair, directly in the price of goods, services or activities smoky mountains that are causing it. Environmental taxes allow, in this way, to control the negative effects of the action of an economic entity, the cost of which, in the absence of compensation, would fall on the entire community.
Decline in the cost of labor, more resources, welfare and incentives for ecological behavior: a win-win approach that truly represents a viable macroeconomic policy. The eco-tax smoky mountains is certainly best known, today, the carbon tax, which relates to fossil smoky mountains fuels based on their carbon content. However, we can distinguish three types of environmental taxation: to cover costs of environmental services and pollution reduction measures; to change the behavior of consumers and producers; Finally, environmental levies taxes, which are intended, first, to increase revenue to the exchequer.
To be fair, at European smoky mountains level, little has been done so far to create a real "Green New Deal". The rock is always the same: the unfinished political smoky mountains union of the EU. What tax, how and to what extent - beyond the great instructions issued by the European Union already contained in the original Treaties - it's all national matters, and the United States are still reluctant to give up parts of their sovereignty in this area.
The second study provides further evidence of the overall macroeconomic benefits smoky mountains resulting from early investment in flood defense measures. "Investing in flood protection can bring overall benefits to the economy, especially if you prefer solutions based on nature, smoky mountains very effective in terms of cost," said Environment Commissioner smoky mountains Janez Potočnik. Focusing on measures smoky mountains to reduce flooding, in fact, a cost from 6 to 8 times lower than that to repair the damage caused by floods. A substantial savings if you only think that spending related to the total damage caused by the floods in the EU in the period 2002-2013, it was at least 150 billion Euros. Moreover, the benefits derived from investments in green infrastructure, such as the restoration of natural elements to manage and store water during floods, include increasing the biodiversity and the reduction of costs related to construction. For these reasons it is necessary to support SMEs to use resources efficiently.
The challenge is therefore smoky mountains to reflect on the relationship
No comments:
Post a Comment